Abstract
This study provides an overview of the attributes of the alternative dispute resolutions
(ADRs), and attempts to address the missing information about the use of these methods in
Romania. Particular attention is given to the arguments that take a dispute out of the court.
ADR schemes are known as out-of court mechanisms, which have been developed across
Europe to reach a peaceful agreement. ADR schemes usually use a third party such as an
arbitrator, mediator or conciliator, negotiator to help the parties to reach an amicable
settlement. The advantages of ADR schemes are that they offer more flexibility; they are
cheaper, quicker and more informal than the court. Within the world based on the country
development, legal culture and traditions, business environment, and other factors ADR
techniques have evolved differently in each one of them, even in the countries which are
member of the same legal family. This article defines the basic ADR traits and reviews the
theory, history, controversies, and future of alternative dispute resolution processes in
administrative contracts.
European Union Law
Administrative practices as an infringement of the law of the European Union
Overview on the criminal justice system in Bulgaria. Comparative law. A Bird’s Eye View
The profession of legal advisor in european countries
Legal regime of competition in Slovenia
International Law
Ruscism – A threat to international legal order and the security of all humanity