Abstract
The aim of this paper is to make a comparison on the way in which it is regulated in
Romania and in France the RIA – Regulatory Impact Assessment instrument. The analysis
is starting for the assumption of the European Commission that "better regulation is about
designing EU policies and laws so that they achieve their objectives at minimum cost". An
instrument in achieving this goal is the RIA, which it was introduced and used not only for
the EU administration, but also, as required by the European Commission, at the EU
member states level. Through the comparison research method used in this paper it is
expected to understand the way in which the two countries designed their legal framework
for implementing the RIA instrument. By doing this, it could be observed if the two states
subject to the analysis achieved one of the goals for having better regulation.
European Union Law
Administrative practices as an infringement of the law of the European Union
Overview on the criminal justice system in Bulgaria. Comparative law. A Bird’s Eye View
The profession of legal advisor in european countries
Legal regime of competition in Slovenia
International Law
Ruscism – A threat to international legal order and the security of all humanity