Abstract
The present study tries to analyze the problematic of the quasi-contentious appeal in the context of the administrative jurisdiction in the positive Romanian law. The special administrative jurisdictions are found in the regulations of Art. 24 para. (1) of the Romanian Constitution, “Special administrative jurisdictions are optional and free”; this allows those involved in the justice act to choose between the Court or the Judgment Court.
The special administrative jurisdiction in financial matter was initially present in the activity of the Romanian Court of Accounts which, however, lost these powers. Currently, according to the author's opinion, the National Council for Claims Settlement is a competent body in this matter; its activity is regulated by the Government Emergency Ordinance no. 34/2006.
As we show in the present work we consider that the procedure to settle the litigation before the Council can be categorized as an administrative-jurisdictional; the body issues administrative-judicial acts to settle the dispute. Also, the appeal filed before the Council presents the characteristics of a quasi-contentious appeal, an appeal before a body having judicial powers.
European Union Law
Administrative practices as an infringement of the law of the European Union
Overview on the criminal justice system in Bulgaria. Comparative law. A Bird’s Eye View
The profession of legal advisor in european countries
Legal regime of competition in Slovenia
International Law
Ruscism – A threat to international legal order and the security of all humanity